Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property > Patent
Obhan & Associates
Patents Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of India, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Becerril Coca & Becerril
Patents Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Mexico, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions Inc., No. 2018-2214 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 12, 2019), the Federal Circuit held claim language could limit the scope of a design
Proskauer Rose LLP
On July 19, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island granted an employer's motion to dismiss a SOX whistleblower claim, holding that the Plaintiff—an in-house attorney...
Holland & Knight
For this reason, the PTAB decision did not even warrant deference.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Henny Penny Corp. v. Frymaster LLC, No. 2018-1596 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 12, 2019), the Federal Circuit held the Board did not abuse its discretion in rejecting a petitioner's obviousness theory ...
Holland & Knight
A day after the decision, Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) issued a statement, where he called for a new patent eligibility test.
Holland & Knight
There is an ongoing struggle over § 101: the Federal Circuit struggles over the appropriate scope; the lower courts struggle to apply the Federal Circuit's decisions; litigants struggle due
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The Federal Circuit took what it called an "unusual" step in Campbell Soup Co. v. Gamon Plus, Inc., Nos. 2018-2029, 2018-2030 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
New applications ordinarily are taken up for examination in the order of their effective United States filing dates.
Ropes & Gray LLP
Motion practice in AIA trial proceedings is typically limited to the handful of motions that may be filed as a matter of right.
Foley & Lardner
The PTAB recently designated two decisions interpreting 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) as precedential. Each decision applies the Federal Circuit's literalist interpretation of § 315(b) ...
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
Through the efforts of the Georgia Intellectual Property (IP) Alliance (GIPA) — a non-profit organization that is bringing together community and lay leaders
Foley & Lardner
On Friday I will be speaking at the AUTM Eastern Regional Meeting, on a panel discussing patent eligibility issues for life sciences inventions. My topic relates to what the USPTO refers to ...
Ropes & Gray LLP
Welcome to the IP(DC) podcast, a podcast covering recent D.C.-based developments in intellectual property law.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Patents Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of United States, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Pryor Cashman LLP
Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme was interviewed by Law360's Bill Donahue in a recent article titled "3 Things To Watch As USPTO's Fee Rule Hits The High Court."
Jones Day
Since their inception as part of the AIA, inter partes reviews (IPRs) have been a favorite tool in the arsenal of patent challengers.
Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation
The federal patent laws provide for an award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party in exceptional patent infringement cases. 35 U.S.C. §285.
Bross and Partners
Patents Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Vietnam, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important to companies and institutions of all sizes and industries.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Through October 1, 2016, the Federal Circuit decided 120 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 95 (79.17%) of the cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 9 (7.50%) of the cases.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
The title above refers to a lyric from a 1998 song by Eve 6, although they used the word "cabinet" instead of "chair."
Jones Day
The PTAB's recent decision instituting post-grant review of a design patent in Man Wah Holdings Ltd. v. Raffel provides interesting perspectives on how design patent invalidity theories work.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Design patents are very different from utility patents in that design patents only protect the ornamental features of an invention. In contrast to utility patents, the design is defined
Hausfeld
Endo's patent litigation against Impax continued, and the trial commenced June 3, 2010.
Jones Day
The unabashed intent of the proposed legislation is to expand what is patentable under § 101, and a draft bill would expressly abrogate any case that has interprete
Fish & Richardson PC
This post is a part of a monthly series summarizing notable activity in patent litigation in the District of Massachusetts, including short summaries of substantive orders
Cooley LLP
As 2019 kicks off, the Cooley antitrust group highlights 10 recent developments and trends corporate counsel should be aware of – from the US Supreme Court and lower courts, the DoJ and FTC ...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with