Mondaq All Regions: Intellectual Property
Minden Gross LLP
Previously, a trademark application could only proceed to registration if the application itself identified the date the trademark was first used or if the applicant filed
SKW Schwarz
What may be considered beautiful or ugly, art or kitsch, obviously lies in the eye of the beholder. Whether the design of an object of utility (patterns or models)
Tsibanoulis & Partners
Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Greece, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Singhania & Co
The answer to whether Bala infringes upon the copyrights of Ujda Chaman remains to be seen.
Rouse
A person called Hardiman has filed a trademark suit against Chelsea Football Club Limited (Chelsea FC) at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court.
Banwo & Ighodalo
The fitness and wellness industry has rapidly evolved over the years, as such the industry is no longer restricted to the traditional varieties of sporting equipment.
J A Kemp LLP
The CJEU has declined to issue a judgment in C-239/19 (Eli Lilly v Genentech). The case concerned a referral from the UK High Court
Haseltine Lake Kempner LLP
Two recent decisions from the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office have highlighted the difficulties applicants and opponents can face when trying to reply on new experimental data to support their arguments.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, Appeal No. 2018-1763 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment...
Foley & Lardner
The PTAB recently designated a decision interpreting 35 U.S.C. § 315(a)(1) as precedential. Cisco Systems Inc. v. Chrimar Systems, Inc.
Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation
If you're familiar with Banksy, you know he's the epitome of counterculturalism.
Volpe and Koenig, P.C.
While it is sometimes the case that intellectual property lawsuits involve subject matter that is overly technical or perhaps difficult to relate to, there are times when these lawsuits involve subjects from popular culture that capture the imagination.
Jones Day
After SAS, does institution of an IPR make a district court more or less likely to stay a parallel litigation? Maybe, maybe not.
Jones Day
In Henny Penny Corp. v. Frymaster L.L.C., No. IPR2016-01435, (P.T.A.B. Mar. 16, 2017), the petitioner (HPC) challenged certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,497,691, ...
Holland & Knight
Tenstreet asserted its patent against DriverReach, a recruiting company for hiring CDL drivers, in the Southern District of Indiana.
Ropes & Gray LLP
In the Fall 2019 issue, we discuss the effort now underway in the U.S. Congress to reform subject matter eligibility for patent protection; U.S. Supreme Court review of PTAB
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
A TTAB judge once told me that in 95% of Section 2(d) cases, one can predict the outcome just from looking at the marks and the involved goods/services
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Despite applicant's 40 years of use of the phrase "THE VITAMIN SHOPPE," the Board affirmed four refusals to register the mark...
Bross and Partners
Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Vietnam, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
B. W. Kahari Legal Practitioners
Trademarks Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Zimbabwe, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
The 2018 California legislative session was another busy year with numerous employment-related bill signed into law.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important to companies and institutions of all sizes and industries.
Shelston IP
The Full Federal Court found that use of the TRIDENT trade mark by the parent company was authorised by the subsidiary.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Through October 1, 2016, the Federal Circuit decided 120 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 95 (79.17%) of the cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 9 (7.50%) of the cases.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
The title above refers to a lyric from a 1998 song by Eve 6, although they used the word "cabinet" instead of "chair."
Corral Rosales
El Servicio Nacional de Derechos Intelectuales -SENADI- del Ecuador rechazó una oposición presentada por el titular de la marca PROZOL y permitió el registro de la marca PREZOIL...
Jones Day
The PTAB's recent decision instituting post-grant review of a design patent in Man Wah Holdings Ltd. v. Raffel provides interesting perspectives on how design patent invalidity theories work.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Design patents are very different from utility patents in that design patents only protect the ornamental features of an invention. In contrast to utility patents, the design is defined
Singh & Associates
Intellectual properties are creations of the mind including inventions, literary and artistic works and symbols, names and images used in commerce
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala
There is currently keen interest amongst tech companies, investors, and research institutes in both artificial intelligence and blockchain technologies.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter