Mondaq Asia Pacific - Singapore: Intellectual Property
Davies Collison Cave
As a starting point, all businesses have a trade mark.
CNPLaw LLP
Protection of registered trade marks and well-known marks – infringement and opposition proceedings
Gowling WLG
In August 2019, the Singapore Government introduced the Second Reading of a new law, the Intellectual Property (IP) Dispute Resolution Bill
Spruson & Ferguson
IPIII offers an insurance policy for enterprises and innovators with a Singapore patent, trademark or registered design.
Spruson & Ferguson
Discussion of factors that led to decision to refuse to allow post grant amendments to a patent.
Khurana and Khurana
The owner of a registered design has the right to stop others from using or selling his design without his/her permission.
Spruson & Ferguson
Considering the dissimilarity of the trade marks, the PAR decided that there was no likelihood of misrepresentation.
Spruson & Ferguson
The Court held that the High Court has limited power to hear applications for patent revocation and to revoke patents.
Spruson & Ferguson
Registered GI owners in Singapore will now enjoy better protection against unauthorised exploitation by third parties.
Davies Collison Cave
All Singapore patent applications filed after 31 December, 2019 will be subject to substantive examination.
Davies Collison Cave
In this case, the defendant would be entitled to a declaration of invalidity in relation to the asserted claims.
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
The long running dispute between Pierre Cardin and Alexander Satryo Wibowo finally reached its conclusion on 28 June 2018 (Supreme Court Decision No. 49 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018).
Davies Collison Cave
The Committee on the Future Economy recently identified innovation as a key driver in Singapore's economy.
Davies Collison Cave
This dispute revolves around a patent (SG43335) for a polishing pad used in the field of semiconductor manufacturing, wherein Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials CMP Holdings (Plaintiff) ...
Ella Cheong LLC
The second and third parts go deeper into issues that were raised in the judgement and aim to provide insights on the legal position regarding parallel importation going forward.
Mirandah Asia
For the above reasons, the Court held that BMS was not entitled to seek the corrections under Rule 58.
Khurana and Khurana
The process of applying for patents in Singapore will become much easier and more efficient after Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) ...
Khurana and Khurana
Intellectual Property of Singapore (IPOS) in its constant endeavor to grow the IP regime and provide an effective legal framework to the local design industries of Singapore has taken a significant step forward...
Gowling WLG
For years, defendants in patent infringement proceedings have brought counterclaims for revocation of the patent. However, a recent High Court judgment indicates that this is no longer possible.
Khurana and Khurana
In a bid to continue the growth of Intellectual Property regime in Singapore, the Intellectual Property of Singapore (IPOS) has launched the Patents Open Dossier (POD) on July 24, 2017.
Most Popular Recent Articles
CNPLaw LLP
Protection of registered trade marks and well-known marks – infringement and opposition proceedings
Gowling WLG
In August 2019, the Singapore Government introduced the Second Reading of a new law, the Intellectual Property (IP) Dispute Resolution Bill
Davies Collison Cave
All Singapore patent applications filed after 31 December, 2019 will be subject to substantive examination.
Khurana and Khurana
The owner of a registered design has the right to stop others from using or selling his design without his/her permission.
Spruson & Ferguson
IPIII offers an insurance policy for enterprises and innovators with a Singapore patent, trademark or registered design.
Spruson & Ferguson
Registered GI owners in Singapore will now enjoy better protection against unauthorised exploitation by third parties.
Spruson & Ferguson
Discussion of factors that led to decision to refuse to allow post grant amendments to a patent.
Spruson & Ferguson
The Court held that the High Court has limited power to hear applications for patent revocation and to revoke patents.
Davies Collison Cave
In this case, the defendant would be entitled to a declaration of invalidity in relation to the asserted claims.
Spruson & Ferguson
Considering the dissimilarity of the trade marks, the PAR decided that there was no likelihood of misrepresentation.
Ella Cheong LLC
The second and third parts go deeper into issues that were raised in the judgement and aim to provide insights on the legal position regarding parallel importation going forward.
Khurana and Khurana
Intellectual Property of Singapore (IPOS) in its constant endeavor to grow the IP regime and provide an effective legal framework to the local design industries of Singapore has taken a significant step forward...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Popular Authors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter