AI produced text is one the most trending topics of the moment, so we asked OpenAI's GPT text tool to write an article about the legal implications of AI produced text, specifically on plagiarism and copyright. In addition, we asked it to compare the law in the European Union to the United States and provide a conclusion. Here's the result.

*The text below is AI generated. The content is published in line with the "fair use policy" and "Sharing and Publication Policy" of Openai.com.
**You should not interpret AI text as legal advice. This text is not and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Information can be outdated, lacking context and in some cases flawed.

Introduction
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more and more integrated into the world of technology, so too does the need to consider the legal implications of such technology. In particular, copyright and plagiarism are becoming increasingly relevant as AI technology continues to expand. This article will explore the concept of plagiarism in the context of AI, looking at what is considered to be plagiarism and when articles are considered to be plagiarised. Furthermore, the article will consider the ownership of copyright and how this applies to AI produced text.

What is Plagiarism?
Plagiarism is the act of taking another person's work and passing it off as one's own. In other words, plagiarism is the unauthorized use of material that is not your own. It is an act of intellectual dishonesty and is considered to be a form of fraud. Plagiarism can take many different forms, from the obvious, such as copying someone else's work without permission and not giving credit to the original author, to the more subtle, such as using someone else's ideas without acknowledgement.

When are Articles Considered to be Plagiarised?
In general, articles are considered to be plagiarised if the author has not provided sufficient acknowledgement to the original source of their information. In most cases, this means providing a citation or link to the source. However, in some cases, it may also mean providing a more detailed explanation of how the original material was used. Generally speaking, it is considered to be plagiarism if the author of an article has copied (or substantially copied) portions of another person's work without providing an appropriate citation or link.

Do You Own the Copyright to AI Produced Text?
When it comes to the ownership of copyright, the legal implications are quite different depending on whether the material was created by a human or by AI. In the European Union (EU), the ownership of copyright is determined by the country in which the work originated. In the United Kingdom, for example, copyright is owned by the author of a work, regardless of whether that work was created by a human or by AI. This means that in the UK, the author of a work produced by AI would own the copyright to that work.

In the United States, however, the situation is slightly different. The US Copyright Office has stated that in the US, copyright is owned by the author of a work only if the work was created by a human. If a work was created by an AI system, then the copyright is owned by the person who owns the AI system (or has the exclusive rights to it).

Conclusion
In conclusion, copyright and plagiarism are becoming increasingly relevant as AI technology continues to expand. Plagiarism is the unauthorized use of material that is not your own, and articles are considered to be plagiarised if the author has not provided sufficient acknowledgement to the original source of their information. Furthermore, the ownership of copyright is different depending on whether the material was created by a human or by AI. In the EU, copyright is owned by the author of a work, regardless of whether that work was created by a human or by AI. In the US, however, copyright is owned by the author of a work only if the work was created by a human. It is therefore important to consider the legal implications of AI technology when it comes to copyright and plagiarism.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.