United States: Mayer Brown Submits Amicus Brief For Chamber Of Commerce In Seventh Circuit Appeal Involving Proper Application Of Punitive Damages Guideposts
Last Updated: July 24 2019

Although the Supreme Court identified three guideposts for evaluating whether a punitive award is unconstitutionally excessive 23 years ago in BMW v. Gore and refined those guideposts 16 years ago in State Farm v. Campbell, lower courts continue to make conceptual errors interpreting and applying the guideposts. The Seventh Circuit will have the opportunity to address and rectify several such errors made by a district court in upholding a $3 million punitive award in Saccameno v. U.S. Bank National Association.

Saccameno involves a mortgagor who went into default before entering bankruptcy. Over several years, Saccameno satisfied all conditions of her bankruptcy, including mortgage payments to defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. After Saccameno received her discharge, an Ocwen employee mistakenly coded her bankruptcy as "dismissed," which meant that Saccameno's loan was returned to the foreclosure department. Ocwen employees failed to fully remedy the error, and made a number of additional mistakes in handling the loan, over the next two years. At that point, Saccameno brought suit for breach of contract and violation of several Illinois and federal consumer-protection statutes.

The jury awarded Saccameno $500,000 for her breach-of-contract and federal statutory claims. Those claims do not support an award of punitive damages. The jury also awarded Saccameno $82,000 in compensation and $3 million in punitive damages for violation of the Illinois consumer-protection statute. In refusing to reduce the punitive award, the trial court compared the punitive damages with the entire $582,000 in compensatory damages awarded by the jury and concluded that the resulting ratio of approximately 5:1 was consistent with due process.

On behalf of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, we filed an amicus brief addressing errors made by the district court in applying each of the three excessiveness guideposts—the degree of reprehensibility of the conduct; the ratio of punitive damages to the harm or potential harm to the plaintiff; and the disparity between the punitive damages and the legislatively established penalties for comparable conduct.

Our amicus brief first discusses a number of errors that the district court made in applying the reprehensibility guidepost. Most fundamentally, the court failed to compare the alleged conduct in Saccameno—mismanagement of a mortgage by low-level employees—with other punishable acts such as discrimination or physical assault.

The district court also erred in analyzing two of the five reprehensibility factors identified by the Supreme Court in State Farm.

The court held that the financial-vulnerability factor was present simply because Saccameno, having recently emerged from bankruptcy, was financially vulnerable. Courts have noted, however, that this factor requires evidence not just that the plaintiff happens to be financially vulnerable, but that the defendant set out to target and exploit individuals who were financially vulnerable. Otherwise, it is hard to see why the mere happenstance of the plaintiff's financial vulnerability makes the defendant's conduct more egregious.

The district court also mistakenly believed that the repeated-misconduct factor applied because the alleged misconduct occurred over time and involved multiple instances of wrongdoing. This factor, however, is intended to more severely punish recidivists, not defendants whose misconduct toward the plaintiff can be atomized into multiple pieces.

On both of these points, the district court's conclusion was contrary to prevailing law interpreting the reprehensibility guidepost and inaccurately portrayed the bank's conduct as particularly egregious when, in fact, it was on the low end of the spectrum of conduct for which punishment may be imposed.

Our brief next demonstrates that the district court made a serious error by including the entire amount of compensatory damages in the denominator of the ratio analysis. Illinois courts do not allow punitive damages for breach of contract, and Congress has not authorized punitive damages for the federal statutory violations alleged by Saccameno.

Moreover, the district court recognized that each cause of action in the case addressed different aspects of the defendant's conduct. Thus, $500,000 of the compensatory damages was attributable to conduct that courts and legislatures have determined does not support an award of punitive damages. By including those damages in the denominator of the ratio analysis, the district court failed to ensure that the punitive damages bear a reasonable relationship to the harm caused by Ocwen's punishable conduct.

Our brief also points out that the district court deviated from the modern trend by refusing to reduce the punitive damages to the amount of compensatory damages or lower even though the compensatory damages unquestionably were substantial and the alleged conduct was nowhere near the high end of the spectrum of punishable conduct.

The thrust of the Supreme Court's decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker is that courts should be allowing ratios of no more than 1:1 in almost every case in which the compensatory damages are substantial and the conduct is not exceptionally reprehensible. Many appellate decisions follow that rule, and our amicus brief urges the Seventh Circuit to reaffirm the Supreme Court's repeated 1:1 guidance in Saccameno.

Finally, we argue that the proper comparison under the third guidepost is with the $25,000 and $50,000 fines that the Illinois legislature has imposed for misconduct in the processing of mortgages. The district court instead compared the $3 million punishment to the financial consequences that would befall Ocwen were it to lose its license to do business in the state.

As we point out in our amicus brief, the Supreme Court in State Farm expressly rejected reliance on the unlikely possibility that a company could lose its business license. The purpose of this guidepost is to tether punitive awards to amounts that the legislature has selected as appropriate punishments for the specific conduct at issue. Simply pointing out that things could theoretically be worse for the defendant does not accomplish that goal.

With all of this fodder, the Seventh Circuit's decision promises to be an interesting one. We will report on it after it's released.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Press Releases from this Firm
Recent Content from this Firm
By Julie A. Gillespie, Jan Stewart, Jeffrey Taft, John-David Treumann
By Richard Nowak, Nancy G. Ross
By Ori Lev
By Phyllis Korff, Candace R. Jackson
By Christopher Comstock, Thomas V. Panoff
By Julie A. Gillespie
By Julie A. Gillespie, Jan Stewart
By Matthew F. Kluchenek
By Anna T. Pinedo
By Michael Hermsen
Font Size:
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions