United States: A Year Of GDPR: Five Recommendations To Help Limit Regulatory Scrutiny

A year ago, on May 25, 2018, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force. With its extraterritorial scope and detailed requirements, the GDPR aimed to change the approach to personal data around the world. We have closely monitored GDPR-related investigations and enforcements actions, as well as guidance published by regulatory authorities across the European Union (EU). During the GDPR’s first year, based on our monitoring, it appears that several trends have emerged with regard to enforcement and regulation. Below, we discuss these trends and outline five key recommendations for ongoing compliance with the GDPR.

Regulatory Developments Over the Past Year

On May 22, 2019, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB)—a European body made up of the heads of the national data protection authorities (DPAs) and the European Data Protection Supervisor that promotes the consistent application of data protection rules throughout the EU—published the results of its latest survey in relation to the GDPR (EDPB Survey). The EDPB Survey found that most DPAs across the EU are reporting an increase in queries and complaints received compared to 2017 and that, since the GDPR came into force, over 144,000 queries and complaints and over 89,000 data breaches have been logged. Not every query, complaint and data breach will be subject to investigation, and it is uncertain how many investigations there are under way as not every DPA publishes figures; however, in light of these numbers, it is likely that scrutiny by the DPAs will increase.

Our monitoring has shown that certain DPAs appear to have been more active than others, such as the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Irish Data Protection Commission and the German DPAs (of which there are 16). Importantly, the DPAs are not solely focusing on big-ticket cases. Organizations of varying sizes in a broad array of industries have been subject to investigations, even including those in the charitable sector. Enforcement actions have taken place against health care entities and governmental departments, political campaigning organizations and funeral homes, taxi companies and retailers alike. Further details appear in the Developing Trends section below.

In addition to investigations and enforcement actions, the DPAs have been active in publishing guidance on the GDPR. The guidance issued since May 2018 covers a range of topics beyond general GDPR implementation, such as regulatory frameworks for social media, human resources management and whistleblowing, standards for biometric testing in the workplace and guidance on cookie walls. Overall, we have seen country-specific guidance that has been published by the DPAs in over 20 countries across the EU. Additionally, the EDPB has published recent guidance on a range of topics, including on the territorial scope of the GDPR, the data implications of a No-Deal Brexit and legitimate processing methods.

Developing Trends

We have seen several trends develop while tracking GDPR investigations and enforcement actions across the EU, each discussed below.

A. DPAs and other authorities continue to monitor whether businesses are transparent about their processing activities and data subjects are paying closer attention to the issue.

In the past year, there have been several complaints, investigations and enforcement actions related to transparency under the GDPR. In particular, companies have faced scrutiny for not providing data subjects with required information where personal data is collected from the data subject.

For example, France’s DPA, the Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), fined Google €50 million (approx. $57 million) for “lack of transparency, inadequate information and lack of valid consent regarding ads personalisation” (see our previous client alert). In addition, the UK’s ICO issued its first enforcement notice under the GDPR to the Canadian data analytics firm, AggregateIQ Data Services (AIQ), for processing personal data without a lawful basis and failing to provide transparency information to the individuals to whom the data referred. Though not established in the EU, AIQ was within the remit of the GDPR because its processing activities involved monitoring data subjects’ behavior in the EU as it was processing personal data of UK individuals on behalf of UK political organizations. The ICO ordered that AIQ erase any personal data that it retained on its servers within 30 days, indicating that a fine amounting up to €20 million or 4 percent of its annual turnover (whichever is higher) could be levied if AIQ failed to do so.

Recently, the Polish Personal Data Protection Office fined a company that aggregates personal and other data from publicly available sources 1 million Polish Zloty (approx. $260,000) for failing to provide information on its processing activities to data subjects.

Competition authorities are also increasingly investigating alleged anticompetitive behavior involving data. For example, in February 2019 the German Bundeskartellamt made an order against Facebook in relation to its use of data and in December 2018 the Italian competition authority issued a fine against the company in the context of personal data use. Furthermore, the UK Government’s Report into Unlocking Digital Competition published radical recommendations in order to protect users of digital platforms, including creating a Digital Markets Unit which would promote data openness and mobility (underscoring the right to portability in the GDPR), monitor machine-learning algorithms to help prevent personalized discriminatory pricing and work with the ICO, CMA and OFCOM to intensify enforcement against data-related infringements.

B. In circumstances where it is appropriate to rely on consent as a lawful basis, DPAs continue to consider carefully whether valid user consent has been obtained.

Under the GDPR, both the circumstances in which it is appropriate to seek consent from data subjects for processing their data and the way in which such consent may be obtained were revamped.

Where consent would be an appropriate lawful basis for processing data (which is not always the case), the DPAs have focused on whether the conditions for obtaining valid consent under the GDPR have been met. Even central government authorities have been penalized for non-compliance. In May 2019, the UK tax authority HM Revenue and Customs was issued with an enforcement notice ordering it to delete data it continued to hold without valid consent after its voice authentication service failed to inform callers properly as to the use of their data. Although this enforcement notice was issued under the pre-GDPR regime, the notice added that the action was taken in relation to contravention of data protection principles set out in the GDPR and the ICO’s investigation was carried out under the GDPR.

Further, in November 2018, the CNIL issued a warning notice to the mobile ad network Vectuary for failing to obtain properly the consent of more than 67 million people and ordered that the company change its consent practices and erase all data collected on the basis of its invalid consent.

C. DPAs and other authorities have fined businesses for not meeting GDPR security standards.

We have seen several enforcement actions and investigations under the GDPR on the basis of a lack of adequate security measures. In July 2018, the Portuguese DPA issued its first fine under the GDPR of €400,000 (approx. $446,000) against a hospital authority on the basis of inadequate technical and organizational measures to prevent unlawful access to personal data. In May 2019, it was the lack of adequate security measures that resulted in the Italian DPA (Garante) issuing its first fine under the GDPR of €50,000 (approx. $55,000) against the Rousseau Association, an online platform operating several websites affiliated with an Italian political party. The Garante noted that though Rousseau had updated its privacy information notice, it failed to adopt several security measures, including having a system in place to strengthen passwords used for creating accounts, properly storing log files regarding activities performed by IT support personnel and measures aimed at anonymizing activities.

In particular, cybersecurity is now broadly seen as integral to financial institutions’ regulatory compliance. The emergence of cybersecurity as one of the key focus areas for financial regulators means that data protection is inexorably connected to compliance with the financial regulatory framework. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the ICO have signed a Memorandum of Understanding with a view to actively share information about potential and ongoing investigations with a data protection dimension. In 2018, the FCA and the ICO carried out a joint investigation into Equifax1 for data protection breaches and, separately, the FCA fined Tesco Personal Finance plc over £16 million (approx. $20 million) for systems and controls-related failings following a cyber-attack that the FCA considered “largely avoidable”.

D. Certain DPAs continue to consider company cooperation as a mitigating factor when evaluating fines.

We have seen several DPAs encourage cooperation with investigations and particularly with data breaches, which has at times resulted in reducing the amount of fines levied. For example, in November 2018 the German State Commission for Data Protection and Freedom of Information Baden-Wuerttemberg (LfDI) issued its first fine under the GDPR, in the amount of €20,000 (approx. $22,300), against Knuddels.de for violations of data security obligations after a hack of more than 300,000 email addresses and passwords. The LfDI stated that the company had benefitted significantly from immediately informing the authority as well as its customers about the hack. The company’s “exemplary cooperation” and significant improvement to its IT security in the aftermath of the investigation resulted in a relatively low fine, in light of the maximum potential fine which could have been applied to Knuddels.de under the GDPR (either €10 million or up to 2 percent of worldwide annual turnover). In contrast, in a relatively minor misdemeanor, the Hamburg Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information issued a fine (rather than simply a warning, for example) against a small shipping company, Kolibri Image, for violating the provision of the GDPR which requires that third parties processing data must use an additional data protection contract to detail the security measures taken by that third party. It was noted that steps had deliberately not been taken to rectify the procedures once the company had been made aware of its duties under the GDPR, as it reportedly tried to shift the responsibility at the feet of another contractor.

E. Some DPAs are halting processing activities in addition to fines.

The risk of fines and reputational damage in the case of noncompliance has been accompanied by the possible temporary or indefinite suspension of processing while an investigation is underway. For example, the Maltese DPA imposed a temporary sanction on the Malta Land Authority while it investigated a data processing breach. The Dutch DPA similarly sanctioned the Dutch tax authority and has indefinitely prohibited the processing of national identification numbers for value-added tax purposes.

F. Common GDPR-related complaints are related to telemarketing, promotional emails and video surveillance.

Finally, we have observed that one of the most common bases for GDPR-related complaints has been with respect to telemarketing, promotional emails and video surveillance. For example, the first fine issued by the Austrian DPA was on a small establishment with a surveillance camera that also recorded individuals who passed on the public sidewalk. Reports have shown that as of February 2019, almost 100 fines have been handed down to contravening parties across the EU, with many investigations still underway. In the 12 months since the GDPR has been in force, the number of spam emails have generally been reduced.

Five Recommendations to Help Limit Regulatory Scrutiny

In light of the trends displayed over the past 12 months, there are actions that can be taken to further develop a business’s GDPR compliance program and mitigate the risks of noncompliance.

First, remember that the GDPR is a journey, not a destination, and ongoing compliance is required. In particular, keep abreast of recent developments, enforcement actions, investigations and guidance. Decisions issued by the DPAs, such as the fine against Google (if it remains in force, as it is currently under appeal), will be informative as the GDPR has garnered momentum.

Second, do not assume that the GDPR applies to the “big fish” only. In March 2019, according to a survey commissioned by the UK’s Institute of Directors, 39 percent of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) did not know who the GDPR affected. In addition, a further 10 percent of SMEs did not think that consumers had any new rights following the introduction of the GDPR. As shown above, however, a large variety of industries and business sizes have been subject to investigation.

Third, implement education and training programs for employees on a regular basis. Many of the recent enforcement actions, as discussed above, have resulted in less onerous penalties for businesses that had proper compliance procedures in place. Consider business-wide training but also targeted training for employees who handle personal data, such as HR, IT, sales and marketing personnel.

Fourth, make sure your incident-reporting and breach notifications programs continues to be adequate. Adopting proper security measures and ensuring that internal controls are at satisfactory levels will help minimize the risk of a breach. With cybercrime on the rise, focus should be placed on what procedures the business has adopted in order to comply with its obligations if and when a breach takes place.

Fifth, take legal advice. In December 2018, 50 percent of regulated organizations were not compliant with the GDPR, according to the International Association of Privacy Professionals. However, with the deadline of complying with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) looming, businesses would be well advised to consider how to leverage compliance programs they have already carried out (and carry them out, if they have not yet done so) under the GDPR in order to achieve compliance with the CCPA.

Conclusion

A year in, and it appears European regulators are only beginning to exercise their new enforcement powers and there is no sign European regulators plan to slow down anytime soon. All eyes are on privacy issues, as the Unites States Congress considers federal legislation that could incorporate aspects of the GDPR, and as the CCPA, modelled in part on the GDPR, races toward its January 1, 2020, enforcement date. We are continuing to monitor these and other developments in the EU. We are also continuing to track developments in the United States as they relate to the CCPA and potential federal privacy legislation.

Footnote

1 As the breach occurred under the pre-GDPR framework the fine was limited to the pre-GDPR maximum of £500,000. Were it to occur under the current sanctions framework, it would likely be significantly higher.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centers
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions