United States: Class Action Fairness Act Roundup

Keywords: Class Action Fairness Act 2005, CAFA, mass actions

Nine years after the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA") was enacted, parties continue to fight over when federal jurisdiction over significant class and mass actions is proper.

In this post, we provide a rundown of some of the most important recent cases involving CAFA.

1. Tenth Circuit greenlights gerrymandered mass action—at least for now.  We've blogged before about plaintiffs' attempts to circumvent CAFA's provisions for the removal of 100-plaintiff mass actions by subdividing mass actions into parallel state-court cases of fewer than 100 plaintiffs each.  CAFA allows removal of these kinds of parallel cases if they are "proposed to be tried jointly."  But plaintiffs often contend—sometimes dubiously—that they are seeking coordinated treatment solely for pretrial purposes in order to avoid removal.  In Parson v. Johnson & Johnson, the Tenth Circuit nevertheless held that district courts must accept these representations and remand the parallel actions to state court until such time as the plaintiffs actually "seek to join the claims for trial."

That result strikes us as both unfortunate and inconsistent with the Eighth Circuit's decision in Atwell v. Boston Scientific.  Judge Anderson observed in a concurring opinion that the plaintiffs' claims "cannot and, in my estimation, will not be addressed in the state court in these cases without some form of proposal (and that is all it takes), either implicit or explicit, for some sort of joint trial."  If so, why allow the jurisdictional doubt to linger until the last moment, when there is (inevitably) a demand for a joint trial?  At that point, a defendant will likely remove the case to federal court, and the federal court will surely review the state court's pretrial decisions—meaning that the pretrial motions practice in state court was a waste of time.  It would also be more consistent with CAFA's purposes—including Congress's desire to prevent plaintiffs from using lax state-court procedures to exert unfair settlement pressure on defendants.  We will continue to watch this circuit split, and will report on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which were argued together on June 19, 2014 and address similar issues.

2. Plaintiff can't use federal-court dismissal to revive state-court class action.  CAFA allows removal of class actions only if, among other things, the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million.  But what if some—or all—of the claims are then dismissed after removal?  Does that reduce the amount in controversy below $5 million and cause a federal court to lose jurisdiction?

Thankfully—and consistent with common sense—the answer is "no," as the Eighth Circuit recently confirmed in Grawitch v. Charter Communications, Inc.  In that case, after a class action was removed to federal court, the court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.  The plaintiff then moved to remand, evidently hoping to get a "do over" in state court under a more lenient pleading standard.  The district court denied remand.  And the Eight Circuit affirmed, explaining that "we measure the district court's jurisdiction at the time of removal."  Grawitch is of a piece with Hoffman v. Nutraceutical Corp., the Third Circuit decision in which the plaintiff tried to avoid CAFA jurisdiction by arguing that his own putative class action couldn't be certified under governing federal precedents.  (That argument still makes us chuckle.)

3. Facially defective claims still count toward CAFA's amount–in-controversy requirement.  A similar question arises when the plaintiff's state-court complaint asserts claims that a district court considers to be so obviously meritless that they inevitably would be dismissed in the future.  Should a court count those claims in determining whether the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million?

Recognizing that jurisdictional lines should be bright, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that such claims should be counted.  In McDaniel v. Fifth Third Bank, the district court had remanded the case to state court, believing that plaintiff's "fraud claims were 'deficient on their face'" and therefore did not count towards CAFA's amount-in-controversy requirement.  The Eleventh Circuit vacated the district court's order, ruling that district courts should "only consider the amount  [that] the plaintiff has placed in controversy, not the amount the plaintiff is likely to recover."  Because the plaintiff "could" theoretically recover on the fraud claims, even if it was unlikely that the plaintiff "would actually recover," the fraud claims had to be included in determining whether the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million.

4. Fifth Circuit holds that CAFA jurisdiction extends to individual actions severed from a class action.  Once a class action has been properly removed under CAFA, what should the federal district court do with any individual actions that are later severed from that class action?  The Fifth Circuit recently held that the individual cases should remain in federal court rather than remanding them to state court.

In Louisiana v. American National Property & Casualty Co., the defendant insurers had removed a class action to federal court under CAFA.  A merits question was then certified to the state supreme court, which confirmed that the key insurance coverage issue at stake in the class action required individualized consideration.  The plaintiffs therefore filed over 1,500 individual amended complaints, which the district court severed from one another and remanded to state court on the assumption that CAFA no longer provided jurisdiction.

The Fifth Circuit reversed, holding that if the initial removal is proper under CAFA, subsequent events do not defeat removal.  The panel acknowledged that a previous Fifth Circuit decision had stated that severed actions must have an independent jurisdictional basis.  Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 415 F.3d 429 (5th Cir. 2005).  But the panel explained that Honeywell applied only to cases in which the district was exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the severed claim.  Because CAFA provides original federal jurisdiction, Honeywell was inapplicable.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions