Keywords: TCPA, class action, FCC regulations

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a favorite of the plaintiffs' class-action bar because it provides for statutory damages of up to $1,500 for knowing or willful violations. With some exceptions, the TCPA prohibits, among other things, unsolicited marketing faxes as well as calls and text messages using autodialers or prerecorded voices. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. §227. Because the TCPA and its regulations impose many complex and technical requirements, the inevitability of innocent slip-ups combined with an active plaintiffs' bar seeking out clever ways to argue that lawful practices are actionable can entail massive potential liability for businesses.

In just over two months, on October 16, 2013, FCC regulations that narrow two key safeguards for businesses under the TCPA will go into effect.

The first change involves the exception from liability for telemarketing calls or text messages placed with the "prior express consent" of the recipient. 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(1). Previously, FCC regulations recognized that "persons who knowingly release their phone numbers have in effect given their invitation or permission to be called at the number which they have given, absent instructions to the contrary." In re Rules & Reg's Implementing the Tel. Consumer Prot. Act of 1991, 7 F.C.C.R. 8752 (1992).

But under the FCC's new interpretation (pdf), with some exceptions, a business qualifies for the "prior express consent" exception from liability only if the consumer has physically or electronically signed a written agreement that "clearly authorizes" the business to send "advertisements or telemarketing messages using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice" to a specific "telephone number." 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(f)(8). The agreement must have a "clear and conspicuous disclosure" that signing the agreement is optional—it can't be a condition of "purchasing any property, goods, or services"—and that a consumer doing so consents to receiving these types of calls. Id. § 64.1200(f)(8)(i).

The second big change going into effect on October 16, 2013, is the elimination of the "established business relationship" exception. Currently, a business can avoid TCPA liability for otherwise prohibited telemarketing calls to residential lines if the business has an "established business relationship" with the plaintiff by virtue, for example, of a purchase from the business within the last 18 months or an inquiry about a product or service within the last three months. Id. § 64.1200(a)(2)(iv) & (f)(5). Under the new regulations, this exemption would be eliminated, requiring most callers to obtain signed written consent from the recipients of these telemarketing calls, even ones who are established customers.

In light of these changes, businesses should revisit their TCPA compliance policies.

Edited by Archis A. Parasharami and Kevin S. Ranlett

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.