Nigeria: Fault Of Counsel' Defence: A Dying Trend - The Case Of Ali Alaba International Limited & Anor v Sterling Bank Plc

Last Updated: 28 November 2018
Article by Temiloluwa Oladele


It has become commonplace for litigants and their counsel to routinely file applications for the extension of time stipulated by the various rules of courts within which they are required to perform certain acts. Filing an application for extension of time has evolved to become, perhaps, the most quotidian application before courts in Nigeria, and motions of this nature have earned the moniker, 'housekeeping applications'.

It has become acceptable practice for courts to grant applications for extension of time as a matter of course without placing much burden on the applicants to convince the court that they indeed deserve the grant of an extension of time within which to perform acts that are essential to their claims or defence. This flexible and lenient approach is often attributed to the 'overriding' interest of justice in furtherance of the constitutional right to fair hearing.

Applicants would argue that a litigant should not be denied the right to fair hearing as a result of procedural tardiness that is not the litigant's fault. It is not unusual to find litigants cite the 'fault of counsel' in their applications for extension of time to perform their obligations.

This article examines the attitude of Nigerian courts towards the defence of 'fault of counsel' in applications for extension of time. It also discusses the respective duties of litigants and counsel in the light of the Supreme Court's decision in Ali Alaba International Limited & Anor v Sterling Bank Plc1, and the implications this decision will have in litigation in Nigeria.


In spite of the number of counsel representing a litigant in a particular case, or the vigour and passion of a litigant's advocates, it is pertinent to note that a matter in court is primarily the concern of the litigant as he will be directly affected by the outcome of the dispute resolution process.

Consequently, the litigant has the duty to provide to his counsel and to the court, all resources necessary for the determination of his case. The litigant also bears the primary responsibility for taking all steps required by the relevant laws and rules of courts in the protection of his interest before a court.


A counsel has a professional duty to represent the interest of his client to the best of his capabilities. Beyond that general duty, the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007 ("the RPC") mandates counsel to, amongst other duties, devote his attention, energy and expertise to the service of his client and, subject to any rule of law, to act in a manner consistent with the best interest of the client.2 A counsel also has the duty not to handle a legal matter without adequate preparation and must not neglect a legal matter entrusted to him.3

In addition to his duty to his client, a counsel has a duty as an officer of the court not do any act or conduct himself in any manner that may obstruct, delay or adversely affect the administration of justice. This includes his duty to file processes and perform all other necessary acts before the court timeously, to aid the quick dispensation of justice.4 Rule 32(2)(e) of the RPC specifically prohibits counsel from intentionally or habitually violati ng any established rule or procedure.


Where there has been an inordinate delay in the performance of actions required by the courts, the rules of court ordinarily impose penalties ranging from the award of costs to an outright dismissal of the matter or appeal without the option of relisting such matter for hearing. Due to the grave consequences of these penalties, the courts, over time, have lent a sympathetic ear to a litigant who claims that a fatal delay was not occasioned by his own laxity but the mistake or ineptitude of his counsel.

The Supreme Court in E.F.P.C. Ltd. v N.D.I.C.5 considered this when it reasoned as follows:

  • "The sins of counsel will not be visited on a party. In the instant case, the Court of Appeal rightly accepted depositions in the affidavit in support of the application for extension of time to appeal to the effect that, mistake of counsel contributed for delay in filing the appeal timeously, as good and substantial reasons to grant extension of time to appeal." (Per Mukhtar JSC)

See also Opekun v Sadiq6; Adegbite & Anor v Amosu7 and Mobil Producing (Nig) Unltd v. Hope.8


Although the courts have been liberal in granting ap plications for extension of time as a matter of course, where the litigant, in its application, blames the failure to timeously take necessary steps on counsel, the litigant has the obligation of showing to the court that he has not been personally negligent.

In Ahmed v Trade Bank Plc9, the Court of Appeal held as follows:

"That the sin of counsel should not be visited on the litigant is without doubt a judicial expedience and although convenient, must not be jeopardized by indiscriminate applications. Hence, to be able to sustain the concept, the applicant needs to show that he acted promptly in giving instruction to his solicitor to file the appeal, but that the inadvertence or negligence of the solicitor caused the delay. It is also the law that even when the applicant acted promptly in instructing his counsel, he is still expected to ensure that the counsel carried out the instruction. This is so because the litigant who fails to ascertain if his counsel has taken the necessary steps to bring his appeal is as well negligent."

In NNPC v Samfadek & Sons Ltd10, the Supreme Court held that the Applicant had:

"an uphill task of convincing this Court that it gave instruction to its counsel to appeal against the decision of 27 May 1996 and counsel failed to do so. Mere instruction to counsel is not sufficient. The Appellant must show that it took some steps to ensure that the counsel complied with the instruction. Applicant has not shown in the supporting affidavit that it took some measures to ensure that its counsel complied with its instruction."


The case of Ali Alaba International Limited & Anor v Sterling Bank Plc11, decided by the Supreme Court (the SC) on 6 July 2018 is of note to this discourse.

The Appellants in this case file d an appeal against the decision of the trial court at the Court of Appeal (the CA) on 19 November 1999. After entering their appeal, they became lax by not filing a brief of argument to prosecute their appeal. The CA thus invoked its powers under the applicable rule of the Court and dismissed the appeal on 10 May 2005.

In December 2005, the Appellants filed an application at the CA to relist the appeal and applied for an extension of time within which to file their brief of argument. The Appellants subsequently withdrew these applications on 18 August 2006, and the CA consequently struck out the applications.

The Appellants then proceeded to instruct a new counsel who filed an application at the CA dated 23 April 2007, seeking an order for extension of time to appeal against the May 2005 decision of the CA which dismissed their appeal. The Appellants also sought an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal against the CA's decision. These applications were granted by the CA and the Appellants proceeded to file a Notice of Appeal at Court of Appeal on 13 December 2007.

The issue for determination before the Supreme Court was whether the Appellants' appeal, having been previously dismissed because they failed to file their brief of argument within time, can be relisted?

In its decision, the Supreme Court answered in the negative and further held that where there has been a failure to file a brief of argument and the court exercises its power to dismiss the appeal, the court becomes functus officio.12 The court agreed with the Respondent that the dismissal operates as a judgment on the merits as it terminates the life of the appeal. It is an irreversible dismissal and the CA cannot relist same.

The Supreme Court referred to its earlier decision in Akanke Olowu & Ors v Amudatu Abolore13 where the Court, per Karibi-Whyte JSC had said of the CA:

"It has no inherent jurisdiction to set aside an order of dismissal properly made in the valid exercise of its jurisdiction and re-enter the appeal. An appeal dismissed on the ground of the failure to file appellant's brief of argument is final. The appeal so dismissed cannot be revived."

The Supreme Court's pronouncement in the Ali Alaba case on the limitation to the defence of 'fault of counsel', reiterates a trend by the courts to impose a duty on a litigant who blames a counsel for its tardiness, mistake, or omission. Eko J.S.C. while agreeing with the lead judgment in the instant case, noted as follows;

"I should think that a time has come for defaulting litigants, relying on error or blunders of their counsel, to be told, and I hereby tell the appellants herein, that it is not enough for them to rely on the error or blunder of the counsel of their own choice, when they are in default of statutorily prescribed time-table for taking steps in litigation; they must show what efforts they made themselves to follow up on the counsel in order that their counsel carried out their instructions within the time prescribed."


The impact of the Supreme Court's pronouncement in the Ali Baba case is that litigants can no longer be content with entrusting their matters to their counsel and then taking a back seat. Litigants will have to exercise some level of diligence to ensure the timely performance of procedural acts required in the litigation, and would be required to be familiar with the respective rules applicable to their matters in order to ensure compliance.

Courts may no longer be predisposed towards granting applications for extension of time as a matter of course. Litigants and counsel who are lax or indolent in prosecuting or defending a claim will not be given an opportunity to delay the speedy resolution of disputes. This is expected to ensure an expeditious hearing of substantive matters before the courts.

Lastly, litigants whose cases are struck out or dismissed due to a failure to take certain actions within the stipulated time owing to fault of counsel may have a right of action against such counsel for breach of duty and professional negligence. This may well serve as an awakening for litigants and counsel who either deliberately or inadvertently fail to keep to the set timelines for taking required actions before the courts, only to purport to take advantage of the right to fair hearing by seeking an extension of time.


1 (2018) 14 NWLR Pt. 1639, at 254

2 Rule 14(1) of the RPC

3 Rule 16(1) of the RPC

4 Rule 30 of the RPC

5 (2007) ALL FWLR (Pt. 367) 793 at 830

6 (2003) 5 NWLR (Pt.814) 475

7 (2016) LPELR-40655(SC)

8 (2016) LPELR-41191(CA)

9 (1996) 3 NWLR (Pt.437) 445

10 Op. Cit

11 14 NWLR Pt. 1639, 254

12 i.e. the Court ceased to have further authority

13 (1993)5 NWLR (pt.255)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions