Nigeria: Right To Protection Of Property Vs. Right Of Way: A Contest For Priority

Last Updated: 26 January 2017
Article by Perchstone & Graeys


Notwithstanding the current global financial meltdown, the Nigerian economy is developing. As with most developing economies, this growth brings along with it an increased, if uneven, level of affluence. This increase in the level of affluence, sadly, appears to have precipitated a rise in the rate of violent crime. In particular, crime in urban areas has reached unsettling levels with a near siege mentality being inflicted on ordinary citizens. It is so endemic that almost everyone can claim to have being a victim or know a victim of a violent crime. Whilst the Police continue to deploy their efforts, a desperate citizenry has had to resort to somewhat novel ideas for the protection of both themselves and their properties. One of such ideas has been the erection of community gates into most residential areas of Lagos State and indeed, in many other urban cities.

The modus operandi is simple enough; the gates operate as a physical control on the entry and exit of all persons into a designated area. Usually, private guards are engaged to man these gates. In most instances, these gates are locked between midnight till about dawn, daily. For the residents, they may be allowed entry or exit only after a protracted identification process. It is obvious that a potential conflict lurks close to the surface in this situation. This is despite the assumed benefit which gates confer. The horrendous traffic snarls in many parts of Lagos is not completely unrelated to the erection of these gates. Additionally, there are numerous anecdotal reports of delayed gate access having cost lives for those who needed to seek urgent medical attention in the middle of the night. This therefore begs the question as to what rights and limitations if any, do persons have to freely use such thoroughfares in view of the desire of others to barricade these routes, thereby restricting ingress and egress?

A Constitutional Perspective

The contest between the right to use such thoroughfares as referred to above and the communal initiatives geared at the protection of lives and property becomes more convoluted when one realises that there is a constitutional flavour to the legitimate exercise of both rights.

Section 33(2)(a) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Constitution) provides amongst other things that a person is entitled to take lawful steps in defending his property.

On the other hand, section 41 of the Constitution generally provides that every citizen of Nigeria is "entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria".

The due reverence is attached to Chapter IV of the Constitution (on "Fundamental Rights") and for which Eso J.S.C. (as he then was) in Saude v. Abdullahi (1989) 4 NWLR. (Pt. 116) 367 lends credence to, when he stated:

"Fundamental Rights are important and they are not just mere rights. They are fundamental. They belong to the citizen. These rights have always existed even before orderliness prescribed rules for the manner they are to be sought."

So far, it is beyond question that: both rights are equally guaranteed and that a satisfactory answer to the question raised in the introduction may not be obtained merely from a perusal of the Constitution. We therefore propose to turn our attention to other aspects of the law; perhaps therein, shall lie our answer.

Right of Way

It is a given fact that thoroughfares such as highways, streets, roads, footpaths and sidewalks are public rights of way. A right of way or an easement as it is otherwise known, is a Common Law property right which confers a non-possessory interest to use real property in the possession of another person for a stated purpose. Simply put, it is a legal right of passage over another's property. A public right of way is therefore a right granted to the general public to travel on or make use of access ways.

In Nigeria generally, by implication of certain provisions of the Land Use Act, what we have are public roads/highways. Even if one proceeds to contend that a road is a private one, then he has the onerous burden of proving such assertion. In fact, the law as was espoused in Seismograph Service (Nig) Ltd. v. Eyuafe (1976) 1 F.N.L.R. 172 is that where the public has used a road for so long a time and the road has come to be looked upon as belonging to the public with the owner's acquiescence, a Court may regard it as evidence that the owner has offered it to the public.

Further on the issue of gates and barricades, some homeowner's have formed vigilante groups amongst themselves. The street goons too have taken a cue. These two groups have declared the protection of property and the security of the neighbourhood as the chief reason for their actions. In some cases these groups, particularly the latter, have been known to discourteously question and, on occasions; assault such road users who stand up to challenge their actions.

A case of Public Nuisance?

It can be argued that the act of erecting barricades or any type of obstruction to a public accessway constitutes an act of Public Nuisance. Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, 17th Edition describes Public Nuisance to wit:

"....Nuisance is an act or omission which is an interference with, disturbance of or annoyance to, a person in the exercise or enjoyment of (a) a right belonging to him as a member of the public...."

In the case of Obasa v. Savage (1931) 10 NLR 104 the Plaintiff widened an existing narrow road to make it fit for vehicular traffic, he then erected a gate across the entrance to the road to enable him collect tolls. The Defendants broke down the gate and the Plaintiff sued for damage for trespass. Butler Lloyd, J. held that the Plaintiff had neither the right to set up the barricade nor collect tolls on the road; hence, the Defendant had a right to abate the nuisance. It is submitted that where road users are harassed and their usage of roads for ingress and egress hindered, the action constitutes a Public Nuisance. It is further submitted that it is of no moment that the Obasa's case bordered on tolls; the substratum of the judgement was that the Plaintiff had no right whatsoever to obstruct access to a public road. At the expense of repetition, a Nuisance, in this context, is anything that annoys a person, interferes with or disturbs his right to enjoyment of a public right. Surely, when a person is being harassed, queried or irritatingly obstructed for exercising his right on the pretext that the right to security of another is ostensibly at stake, in the present context, the right of the former must take priority and an action in Nuisance may lie.

Criminal Liability

If one is still doubtful as to position of the law on the sanctity attached to the right of any person to move freely, the provision of section 38 of the Criminal Code, CAP C.38, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 is instructive. The Code provides inter alia:

"Any person who obstructs any highway, by any erection thereon which renders the highway less commodious to the public than it would otherwise be; or does any act not warranted by law...which act or omission obstructs or causes inconvenience to the public in the exercise of rights common to the public is guilty of a misdemeanor and imprisonment for two years"

Most interestingly, the proviso to section 234 of the Criminal Code goes on to add that it is inconsequential that "the act complained of is convenient to a larger number of the public than it inconveniences", so the residents of the neighbourhood allegedly being protected are not at liberty to put up the defence that in a bid to protect their lives and properties, another's right can be trampled upon.

The scope and extent given to the term "highway" in a state legislation, to wit The Highways (Removal of Obstructions) Law, CAP. H5, Laws of Lagos State of Nigeria, 2003, complements our argument. Section 7(2) of the Law provides:

"highways" includes any street or any roadway, side-road, sideways adjacent to the highway or street to which the public have access or any market place or square or any open space under any bridge in Lagos State or any open space under any bridge in Lagos State..."

In summary the writer's position is that public roads/highways are for the public's passage and re-passage. Therefore, an interference with any part of a public road/highway constitutes nuisance. If this premise is correct, as it does appear to be, then an obstruction of such public roads and highways is actionable by an aggrieved person who can prove damage over and above that suffered by the public.

However at this juncture, the question may be posed: "Is Public Nuisance not actionable only at the instance of the Attorney-General?" Aderemi J.C.A. (as he then was) responds unequivocally in Total (Nig.) Plc v. V.I.I.R.A. (2004) 7 NWLR (pt 873), 465 that:

"any citizen who perceives that his right has been infringed can bring an action against ... anybody deriving some right or benefit from such act of infringement without obtaining the consent of the Attorney-General in order to obtain a redress of the violation of his rights".

Narrowing it down to issues bordering on Public Nuisance, his Lordship went on:

"the government has the fundamental duty to ward off any Public Nuisance. And where the government fails to act and the nuisance affects a citizen...the citizen has a right to bring an action to seek redress and make the Attorney-General, the number one Law Officer of the Government, a party in his suit."


The right of every citizen is sacred. But where one citizen in an unconscionable exercise of his own rights infringes on that of another citizen who is acting rightly within his rights, the latter shall take priority. In a similar vein, where a person's right to use a road freely is unfairly prejudiced by the acts of another, under the guise of exercising their right to protect themselves, the former's right shall take precedence. In fact, relying on the authority of Obasa v. Savage (supra) the person who has being wronged can take reasonable steps to abate the nuisance.

In the book "Law of Trespass to Land and Nuisance" the following statement is made:

"public highways...are deemed as dedicated for the purpose of passage and for other reasonable and usual mode of using it. Such reasonable user includes parking vehicles for a reasonably short period, or sitting by the road side to rest up a while..."

Indubitably, crime is on the increase in Nigeria, with criminals becoming more daring and equipped for their heinous business. Armed with the knowledge of these developments, it is prudent for the citizenry to take adequate steps to beef up the level of security in their neighbourhoods. In doing this however, they must ensure that the rights of others are adequately considered and respected.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions