LATEST ARTICLES
United States
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
April 11, 2024 - On April 4, 2024, the Delaware Supreme Court (the "Court"), in an opinion decided en banc and delivered by Chief Justice Seitz...
Foley & Lardner
In LeTip World Franchise LLC v. Long Island Social Media Group LLC, the U.S. District of Court for the District of Arizona granted a temporary restraining order in favor of a franchisor, LeTip World Franchise LLC against the defendants, ...
Nossaman LLP
In surprising news for the California county retirement system community, on April 17, 2024, the California Supreme Court granted review of Ventura County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Criminal Justice Attorney's Ass'n of Ventura County (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 1119 (the VCERA decision).
Goulston & Storrs
In Griffin v. Melrose MA Plan. Bd., pro se plaintiff David Griffin ("Griffin") appealed a decision of the Melrose Board of Appeals (the "Board") granting a special permit to Middlesex Development...
Goulston & Storrs
The case of Porter v. Bd. of Appeal of Boston is the latest case that involves an eternal question posed by developers: how does a developer whose development permits are challenged...
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a decades-old circuit split regarding what amount of harm a plaintiff must demonstrate to bring an employment discrimination claim ...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In this special report, we review trends over time in PTAB post-grant appeals to the Federal Circuit.
Mayer Brown
Answering a precise question increasingly raised by securities fraud plaintiffs, the United States Supreme Court held in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners that a failure to disclose information cannot support a private action under Rule 10b–5(b).
Goodwin Procter LLP
To prevail on a claim of unlawful employment discrimination, a plaintiff must establish that the employer took an "adverse employment action" because of the employee's protected class.
Crowell & Moring LLP
On April 17, 2023, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, holding that transferees alleging discrimination under Title VII ...
Liskow & Lewis
On April 17, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the Coast Guard's determination that a vessel is considered "built in the United States" for purposes...
Proskauer Rose LLP
On April 17, 2024, the United States Supreme Court ruled on the standard under which a plaintiff can proceed with a claim for a discriminatory job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII").
Exponent
On Nov. 17, the Food and Drug Administration released the final guidance for assessing the credibility of computational modeling and simulation (CM&S) in medical device submissions.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in one of the most anticipated employment cases of this term. In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court considered whether Title...
Duane Morris LLP
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled unanimously that lower courts cannot require a plaintiff to show a heightened level of harm—such as "significant" or "material" harm...
Littler Mendelson
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court decided that employees do not need to suffer "significant" harm to state a claim of discrimination under Title VII.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
2023 was an exciting year for Section 337 litigation at the ITC and 2024 is off to an equally interesting start. In this article, Libbie DiMarco reviews five of the most interesting recent developments...
WilmerHale
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964...
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
A divided panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement, holding that importation of two product samples into the U.S. was reasonably related to obtaining FDA approval based on the particular facts of this case.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Plaintiff Sade Coker worked for law firm Goldberg & Associates, P.C. (the Firm) as an executive assistant to its principal attorney for approximately five weeks in 2020.
Mondaq Webinars
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Comparative Guides
Curated Content
Popular Contributors
Riker Danzig LLP
United States
Thompson Coburn LLP
United States
Hall Benefits Law
United States
Upcoming Events
APR29
APR29
Panel New York United States
Mondaq Advice Centres
